guide
Emotional Trading: Decisions, Risk and Planning
Explore how fear, FOMO and recent results can affect trading decisions, with worked examples and the limits of stop orders and trading rules.
1. Recognizing Emotional Decisions
Emotional trading means allowing an immediate feeling to replace the reasoning behind a decision. A loss, a winning streak or a stream of excited posts can become the reason to change a position. The patterns below are examples for reviewing decisions. They do not describe a fixed market cycle, diagnose a trader or tell you where prices will go next.
All monetary examples below are invented. Currency selection changes their symbols, not the amounts or the calculations.
Confidence
A position moves in your favor and taking more risk feels easier. Check whether new evidence supports a change in size or whether the recent result is doing the persuading.
Urgency
A rapid move or other people's reported gains create pressure to enter immediately. Separate the reason an asset caught your attention from the reason you would hold it.
Discomfort
An unrealized loss makes a planned exit harder to accept. Record what changed in the market and what changed only in your willingness to recognize the loss.
Fear
Uncertainty creates a wish to close a position quickly. An exit can still be justified by new information or risk limits; feeling afraid does not make every sale a mistake.
Withdrawal
After losses, you may want to stop making decisions. Pausing new trades does not remove the risk of positions or orders that remain open.
Regret
A later price move makes an earlier decision look obviously wrong. Review the information available at the time instead of assuming the later outcome was predictable.
Re-entry pressure
You may want another trade to recover a loss or catch a missed move. That motive does not establish the expected return, execution quality or suitability of the next trade.
These feelings can overlap, occur in a different order or never appear. A written process can make changes easier to review; it cannot eliminate uncertainty or guarantee a profit.
2. FOMO and Attention
Notice the decision change
Possible warning signs include entering without defining the exposure, increasing size because someone else made money, or replacing an exit plan after reading promotional posts. A price rise alone does not establish that an entry is emotional. The useful question is whether the decision has a reason you can state and check.
Separate attention from evidence
Record where the idea came from, the evidence for it and what would count against it. Compare the proposed quantity and potential loss with your existing exposure. Waiting, reducing exposure or taking no new position are possible choices, not universally optimal strategies.
Barber and Odean studied stock transactions and found attention-related differences in individual investors' buying and selling. Their attention measures included news, unusual volume and extreme returns. This does not establish that every popular cryptocurrency is overvalued or identify a universally worst entry time. Barber & Odean (2008)
3. Fear, Exit Plans and Execution
Feeling frightened and having a reason to exit are different questions. New information, changed liquidity or an exposure you cannot sustain may justify a decision even when a price-based exit reference has not been reached. A price threshold alone cannot confirm that the original reasoning remains valid.
A planned loss is an estimate, not a guaranteed maximum. A stop-market instruction becomes a market order when its trigger condition is met; the fill can differ from the trigger. A stop-limit instruction can remain unfilled. Bybit's documentation also describes conditional-order rejection and differences between the price used to trigger an order and the price used for liquidation. Check the rules for the actual product. Fees, funding and execution can change the result. Bybit
For a hypothetical linear long position with notional value $10,000, an adverse price move of 2% gives a gross loss of $200. This equals 2% of $10,000, or 10% of $2,000. These are two alternative account sizes, not two losses on one account. The calculation excludes costs and assumes the stated price move and execution; it is not a stop-loss guarantee.
4. Unrealized Gains and Partial Sales
Measure the change from the right reference
Imagine buying 4 units at $1,800 each, for $7,200. At $4,000, the holding is worth $16,000 and its unrealized gain is $8,800. If the price later reaches $2,200, the remaining unrealized gain is $1,600. The gain has fallen by $7,200, or approximately 81.82% of its peak. This is a reduction in unrealized gain, not the percentage fall in price or a loss of the original purchase cost.
A separate partial-sale illustration
Suppose 1 of those original units is sold at $2,700 and the same quantity at $3,600. Proceeds are $6,300; their allocated purchase cost is $3,600; realized gain is $2,700. The remaining 2 units at $2,200 have an unrealized gain of $800. Total gain is $3,500 before fees and taxes. Each sale is 25% of the original quantity. This is one hypothetical outcome, not an optimal exit rule or a way to capture most of every price move.
The prices are invented inputs for arithmetic, not a historical ETH case study. An unrealized gain can increase or disappear. A partial sale changes the exposure that remains and does not guarantee a better final result.
5. Increasing Risk After a Loss
The following separate example starts with $10,000 of equity. It assumes three completed linear trades, each losing exactly 2% of notional, with no fees, funding, transfers or other positions. Its purpose is to show the denominator behind an account-loss percentage.
First trade: $100 loss
A $5,000 position loses 2% of its notional. Equity falls to $9,900. The loss is 1% of the starting account.
Second trade: $200 loss
Increasing notional to $10,000 doubles the gross loss from the same assumed price move. Equity falls to $9,700. The second loss is 2% of starting equity; that denominator is not the smaller equity remaining after the first trade.
Third trade: $400 loss
At $20,000 notional, the same assumed move loses $400. Equity falls to $9,300. Increasing size has increased the amount at stake without changing the assumed price move.
Total: $700 lost
The three losses sum to $700, or 7% of the original $10,000. Leverage alone would not tell us that account percentage or a liquidation time. Actual fill prices and product costs can produce a different outcome.
A pause or a preset limit on additional risk can interrupt an impulsive sequence. No universal number of losing trades or fixed waiting period guarantees recovery. Existing positions and orders still need appropriate attention while new trading is paused.
6. Confidence After Wins
A winning outcome does not, on its own, show why a trade worked. Compare the recorded reasoning, position size and execution with the plan, including trades that lost. A handful of outcomes can reflect chance; there is no universal trade count that establishes a reliable advantage. Changing conditions, costs and dependence between trades also matter.
Thaler and Johnson's experiments found that prior gains and losses could affect subsequent risky choices, including willingness to take risk after gains and the appeal of breaking even after losses. These experimental findings do not rank fear and confidence by their danger to every crypto account. Thaler & Johnson (1990)
7. What the Research Can Explain
Sources reviewed on 2026-09-10. The studies and documentation support the stated scope; they do not verify a cryptocurrency strategy or an account outcome.
Losses and reference points
Tversky and Kahneman's 1992 model describes choices relative to reference points. Its reported median loss-aversion estimate of 2.25 was a fitted parameter from experimental choices, not a universal measurement of physical or emotional pain. Tversky & Kahneman (1992)
Recent results
An outcome can become the reference for the next decision: preserving a recent gain, recovering a loss or returning to a previous account balance. Naming that reference makes it easier to separate the desired outcome from the evidence for a new position.
Competing explanations
When reviewing a position, write down information that would support it and information that would weaken it. A review that only collects agreeable examples cannot test the original reasoning.
Limits of the evidence
Studies of stock transactions and experimental choices address particular questions and populations. Applying their ideas to cryptocurrency trading is an interpretation, not proof of a profitable strategy, a diagnosis or a forecast of the next market move.
8. A Decision and Review Checklist
R denotes a fixed money amount used as the loss unit in both hypothetical models; it does not specify a fraction of account equity. A reward-to-risk ratio does not determine expected profit. In a hypothetical model, a 2R win with probability 20%, and a 1R loss otherwise, has expected result -0.4R before costs. A 1R win with probability 80%, and the same loss otherwise, has expected result +0.6R. These assumed probabilities illustrate the arithmetic; they are not forecasts or measured success rates.
Define the instrument, quantity, existing exposure and reason for the decision before changing a position.
Record the chosen exit reference, order behavior and possible execution limitations.
Distinguish an estimated price loss from fees, funding and the amount that could actually be lost.
Log the information available, the decision, the emotional state and the outcome for later review.
Identify conditions for pausing new risk and how existing positions and orders will be monitored.
Check whether a change in size follows new evidence or only the desire to recover a loss or repeat a win.
Review losing and winning decisions using the same criteria; do not infer skill from the outcome alone.
Consider probabilities and costs alongside a proposed reward-to-risk ratio.
Risk Management GuideFrequently Asked Questions
How can I recognize an emotional trading decision?
Can a trading plan remove emotions?
What is useful to record in a trading journal?
Is it always better to avoid volatile events?
Can a bot prevent emotional trading?
What should a review after a large loss cover?
Derivatives & Leveraged Products — Important Risk Warning
Derivatives and leveraged products are complex and carry a high risk of rapid, substantial losses. Depending on the product and account rules, losses can exceed the initial margin or money committed. A stand-alone purchased option can lose its entire premium plus transaction costs; writing options, exercising into another position, or combining positions can create additional obligations. An uncovered call writer can face unlimited loss. Applicable legal protections can affect the loss boundary.
You should carefully consider whether you understand how derivatives work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, or a recommendation to trade derivatives.
Legal availability and regulatory protections depend on the product, service, provider and jurisdiction. In the EU, check the applicable investment-services rules, including MiFID II where relevant, and any product restrictions. Before trading, verify with the relevant regulator whether the provider has the permissions required for the service and whether the product may be offered to you. A website being accessible, or a product appearing on this website, does not establish authorization or eligibility.
Continue Learning
Get Started with Kraken
Sign up in minutes and get started with Kraken — a regulated exchange operating since 2011, with deep liquidity and low fees.
Visit KrakenAd · Digital asset prices are subject to high market risk and price volatility. Don't invest unless you're prepared to lose all the money you invest. Terms & risk disclosure
This page contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you.